ERR3675481

ENA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

95/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Bulk-RNA-seq on HiSeq 2500 for Drosophila simulans with excellent quality (98.6% Q20, 97% Q30). High-fidelity D. simulans dataset enables detection of rare transcripts and precise quantification for model-organism genomics.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Drosophila simulans

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 552172950 reported

total reads 11043459 reported

n content pct 0.002 measured

pct q20 bases 98.6 measured

pct q30 bases 97 measured

gc content pct 49.3 measured

mean read length 50 measured

mean base quality 36 measured

adapter content pct 0.5 measured

duplication rate pct 43.83 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 95/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 97 measured ×1 100%

mean base quality 36 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 0.5 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 43.83 measured ×0.4 69%

QC cost 26 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0