Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
54/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Illumina MiSeq targeted-capture sequencing of the carnivorous plant Nepenthes kerrii (718k reads, 432 Mb, 45.5% GC) with moderate quality (91.2% Q20, 82.1% Q30, zero N). Enables coding-region variant discovery in this understudied plant. Slightly lower Q30 reflects MiSeq platform baseline but remains adequate for variant calling.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WES thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0