ERR3712100

ENA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

65/100 · D

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Whole-exome capture-sequencing on MiSeq for Nepenthes leonardoi with good quality (93% Q20, 84.6% Q30). Exome approach targets coding sequences for genetic-variation discovery in this carnivorous plant.

Data type / assay

WES

Organism

Nepenthes leonardoi

Instrument

Illumina MiSeq

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 236750346 reported

total reads 393273 reported

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 93 measured

pct q30 bases 84.6 measured

gc content pct 44.8 measured

mean read length 301 measured

mean base quality 34.2 measured

adapter content pct 25.52 measured

duplication rate pct 4.71 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 65/100

The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WES thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 84.6 measured ×1 73%

duplication rate pct 4.71 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 25.52 measured ×0.4 0%

QC cost 6 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0