ERR3712173

ENA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

100/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Whole-exome capture-sequencing on MiSeq for Nepenthes angustifolia (carnivorous plant) with good quality (96.9% Q20, 92.1% Q30). Exome focus enables coding-sequence variant discovery and assessment of allelic diversity in this specialized Nepenthes species.

Data type / assay

WES

Organism

Nepenthes angustifolia

Instrument

Illumina MiSeq

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 1635127200 reported

total reads 5450424 reported

n content pct 0.001 measured

pct q20 bases 96.9 measured

pct q30 bases 92.1 measured

gc content pct 43.4 measured

mean read length 150 measured

mean base quality 38.2 measured

adapter content pct 1.26 measured

duplication rate pct 8.98 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 100/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WES thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 92.1 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 8.98 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 1.26 measured ×0.4 98%

QC cost 21 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0