ERR3988875

ENA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

98/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Homo sapiens

Instrument

Illumina NovaSeq 6000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), BAM/CRAM (aligned)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 118564051500 reported

total reads 790427010 reported

mean coverage 38.2 extrapolated

n content pct 0.011 measured

pct q20 bases 98.3 measured

pct q30 bases 97.4 measured

gc content pct 51.2 measured

mean read length 150 measured

mean base quality 29.6 measured

adapter content pct 0.22 measured

duplication rate pct 12.24 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 98/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean coverage 38.2 extrapolated ×1.2 100%

pct q30 bases 97.4 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 12.24 measured ×0.5 87%

adapter content pct 0.22 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 32 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0