Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
83/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This is bulk human RNA-seq from an Illumina HiSeq 2000, and it earned a solid B (83/100): the per-base quality is excellent, with mean base quality of 37.9 and 96.7% of bases at Q30, alongside zero adapter contamination, so the raw sequence itself is clean and reliable for expression analysis. The single factor dragging the grade down is an 85% duplication rate, which scored 0 on its metric — though for high-depth RNA-seq a large fraction of duplicates is expected from highly expressed transcripts rather than purely a library-complexity defect, so judge it against your application (it matters more if you intend to deduplicate or call variants than for standard differential-expression work). One caveat for reuse is the short 51 bp single-end-length reads, which limit confident multi-mapping resolution and splice-junction detection. Note that the core quality metrics here are genuinely measured rather than extrapolated, so this reading is reasonably firm rather than provisional, though the headline read/base counts are reported rather than independently verified.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0
Scientific quality
Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.