ERR409954

ENA first seen 2015

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

74/100 · C

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Pogona vitticeps

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 19414479238 reported

total reads 198106931 reported

n content pct 0.004 measured

pct q20 bases 99.1 measured

pct q30 bases 97.1 measured

gc content pct 41.7 measured

mean read length 49 measured

mean base quality 38.1 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 39.1 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 74/100

The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 97.1 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 39.1 measured ×0.5 3%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 51 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0