ERR413118

ENA first seen 2014

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

87/100 · B

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Illumina HiSeq 1000 whole-genome short-read sequencing of the legume Lathyrus sativus yielded 3.9M reads (783M bases) with strong quality (94% Q20, 85% Q30, 41.1% GC). Low error rate (0.058% N) supports variant calling and genome assembly applications. Plant WGS and legume genomics researchers would locate this via short-read sequencing searches.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Lathyrus sativus

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 1000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 783004116 reported

total reads 3876258 reported

n content pct 0.058 measured

pct q20 bases 94 measured

pct q30 bases 85 measured

gc content pct 41.1 measured

mean read length 101 measured

mean base quality 34 measured

adapter content pct 0.06 measured

duplication rate pct 2.01 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 87/100

The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 85 measured ×1 75%

duplication rate pct 2.01 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0.06 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 29 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0