ERR418043

ENA first seen 2020

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

57/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

WGS on HiSeq 2000 for Solanum lycopersicum (cultivated tomato) with good quality (91.6% Q20, 83.6% Q30). Reference genome replication enables validation and assessment of genetic diversity across tomato accessions.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Solanum lycopersicum

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), BAM/CRAM (aligned)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 30598265700 reported

total reads 152991539 reported

n content pct 0.002 measured

pct q20 bases 91.6 measured

pct q30 bases 83.6 measured

gc content pct 44.1 measured

mean read length 100 measured

mean base quality 33 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 43.23 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 57/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 83.6 measured ×1 68%

duplication rate pct 43.23 measured ×0.5 0%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 1 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0