Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
99/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Illumina HiSeq 2000 whole-genome sequencing of Staphylococcus aureus (825k reads, 165.1 Mb, 34% GC) with high quality (97.9% Q20, 94.8% Q30, 0.012% N). Supports variant calling and epidemiological genotyping in this clinically important pathogen. Low GC composition typical of staph enables reliable mapping.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0