ERR419111

ENA first seen 2020

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

81/100 · B

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Illumina HiSeq 2000 whole-genome sequencing of Staphylococcus aureus (2.9M reads, 574.9 Mb, 35.2% GC) with good quality (96.6% Q20, 90.8% Q30, 0.013% N). Supports variant calling and epidemiological typing. Moderate GC composition and deep coverage support reliable assembly.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Staphylococcus aureus

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), BAM/CRAM (aligned)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 574865800 reported

total reads 2874329 reported

n content pct 0.013 measured

pct q20 bases 96.6 measured

pct q30 bases 90.8 measured

gc content pct 35.2 measured

mean read length 100 measured

mean base quality 35.8 measured

adapter content pct 0.01 measured

duplication rate pct 31.33 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 81/100

The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 90.8 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 31.33 measured ×0.5 27%

adapter content pct 0.01 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 37 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0