ERR4300959

ENA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

87/100 · B

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: reported

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Rattus norvegicus

Instrument

Illumina NovaSeq 6000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Files available

FASTQ

Metrics (value · how obtained)

base count 2375658561 reported

read count 11949386 reported

parent study PRJEB39130 reported

library layout PAIRED reported

read length bp 198.8 extrapolated

library strategy RNA-Seq reported

checksums present yes reported

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 6 scored metric(s) → 87/100

The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

raw data available reported ×1.4 100%

depth reported ×1.2 46%

read length reported ×0.8 100%

layout paired reported ×0.6 100%

integrity verifiable reported ×0.6 100%

instrument declared reported ×0.4 100%

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-meta-1.0 · provisional — verify independently