Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
NovaSeq 6000 bulk RNA-seq of Bemisia tabaci produced 30.9M reads (5.6 Gb, 39.8% GC) with exceptional quality (95–99% bases at Q20–Q30), providing deep coverage for comprehensive transcriptome characterization and splice-variant discovery in this agricultural pest. The clean sequencing metrics and high read depth support sensitive quantification of condition-specific or developmental gene expression.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0