Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
97/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
NovaSeq 6000 bulk RNA-seq from Bemisia tabaci (31.6M reads, 5.7 Gb, 42.5% GC) with excellent quality (98.8% Q20, 95.9% Q30, zero N). High-depth dataset supports whitefly strain differentiation and host-plant interaction studies. Low error profile and comprehensive coverage enable novel transcript discovery.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0