Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
83/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
NovaSeq 6000 RNA-seq of the wood white butterfly Leptidea sinapis yielded 20.5M reads (3.1 Gb, 45.7% GC) with premium quality (98.9% Q20, 96.6% Q30, zero N). Clean, high-depth transcriptomic data supports developmental-stage profiling and lepidopteran comparative genomics. The exceptional Q-scores enable variant calling within expressed regions.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0