Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
78/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
NovaSeq 6000 RNA-seq of the butterfly Leptidea sinapis generated 28M reads (4.2 Gb) with exceptional quality (96–99% bases at Q20–Q30) and minimal sequencing error, enabling sensitive detection of developmentally-regulated transcripts and host-microbe interactions in this lepidopteran species. High-depth transcriptomics and insect developmental biology searches apply.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0