Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
80/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
NovaSeq 6000 RNA-seq of Leptidea sinapis yielded 28.4M reads (4.2 Gb, 47.6% GC) with excellent quality (96–99% bases at Q20–Q30), providing sufficient depth for sensitive transcript abundance profiling and discovery of rare isoforms in butterfly transcriptomics studies.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0