Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
79/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
NovaSeq 6000 RNA-seq of Leptidea sinapis generated 23.8M reads (3.5 Gb, 48.5% GC) with excellent quality (95–98% bases at Q20–Q30), enabling accurate quantification of transcript abundances and confident detection of lowly-expressed regulatory genes in butterfly developmental and tissue-specific studies.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0