ERR469644

ENA first seen 2019

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

47/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

bovine gut metagenome

Instrument

Ion Torrent PGM

Platform

ION_TORRENT

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 142185710 reported

total reads 588456 reported

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 81.2 measured

pct q30 bases 43.1 measured

gc content pct 51.6 measured

mean read length 235.7 measured

mean base quality 26.6 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 1.78 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 47/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 43.1 measured ×1 0%

duplication rate pct 1.78 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 11 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0