ERR475527

ENA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

86/100 · B

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

amplicon

Organism

Homo sapiens

Instrument

Illumina MiSeq

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 282002014 reported

total reads 561757 reported

n content pct 0.035 measured

pct q20 bases 90 measured

pct q30 bases 85.7 measured

gc content pct 52.6 measured

mean read length 251 measured

mean base quality 33.8 measured

adapter content pct 0.03 measured

duplication rate pct 96.05 measured

mean target coverage 4.5 extrapolated

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 86/100

The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 85.7 measured ×1 79%

adapter content pct 0.03 measured ×0.5 100%

QC cost 27 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0