Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
61/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
HiSeq 2000 WGS of human genomic DNA produced 8M reads (1.2 Gb) with 100% Q20 and 95.6% Q30, but extrapolated coverage of only 0.4× severely limits utility to rare-variant validation or targeted augmentation rather than independent genome sequencing. The unusual 100% Q20 warrants quality-score assessment; human WGS, variant calling, and exome validation searches apply, though reuse is conditional on understanding this dataset's shallow coverage limitation.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0