ERR489055

ENA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

54/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Ovis aries

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 1787838188 reported

total reads 5919994 reported

n content pct 0.67 measured

pct q20 bases 92.4 measured

pct q30 bases 78.7 measured

gc content pct 44.4 measured

mean read length 151 measured

mean base quality 32.4 measured

adapter content pct 18.78 measured

duplication rate pct 20.82 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 54/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 78.7 measured ×1 44%

mean base quality 32.4 measured ×0.6 73%

adapter content pct 18.78 measured ×0.4 7%

duplication rate pct 20.82 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 21 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0