ERR489144

ENA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

87/100 · B

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Ovis aries

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 2794663304 reported

total reads 9253852 reported

n content pct 0.001 measured

pct q20 bases 96.3 measured

pct q30 bases 88.1 measured

gc content pct 46 measured

mean read length 151 measured

mean base quality 34.6 measured

adapter content pct 11.68 measured

duplication rate pct 18.75 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 87/100

The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 88.1 measured ×1 91%

mean base quality 34.6 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 11.68 measured ×0.4 46%

duplication rate pct 18.75 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 31 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0