Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
68/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Illumina HiSeq 2000 bulk RNA-seq from Anopheles gambiae (211.7M reads, 42.8 Gb, 53.5% GC) with very high depth but moderate quality (88.3% Q20, 78.9% Q30, 0.088% N). Massive read accumulation enables novel transcript discovery and lowly-expressed gene detection. Reuse suits abundance analyses; variant applications require filtering.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0