ERR5102833

ENA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

92/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: reported

Data type / assay

amplicon

Organism

metagenome

Instrument

unspecified

Platform

ILLUMINA

Files available

FASTQ

Metrics (value · how obtained)

base count 24616000 reported

read count 98464 reported

parent study PRJEB38148 reported

library layout PAIRED reported

read length bp 250 extrapolated

library strategy AMPLICON reported

checksums present yes reported

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 6 scored metric(s) → 92/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

raw data available reported ×1.4 100%

depth reported ×1.2 100%

read length reported ×0.8 100%

layout paired reported ×0.6 100%

integrity verifiable reported ×0.6 100%

instrument declared reported ×0.4 0%

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-meta-1.0 · provisional — verify independently