ERR5279461
ENAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
76/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Clathrina sp. GW2982 (sponge) RNA-seq on NextSeq 500 with 57.1 million 100 bp reads at 90.3% Q20 and 85.6% Q30 across 5.71 Gb provides moderate quality for invertebrate transcriptomics. The 42.8% GC reflects sponge genomes; suitable for comparative expression analysis across developmental stages or environmental conditions.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0
Scientific quality
Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.