ERR531455

ENA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

91/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

amplicon

Organism

human oral metagenome

Instrument

unspecified

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 25870569 reported

total reads 273301 reported

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 96.5 measured

pct q30 bases 87.4 measured

gc content pct 52.9 measured

mean read length 94.7 measured

mean base quality 34.8 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 97.82 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 91/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 87.4 measured ×1 87%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.5 100%

QC cost 5 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0