ERR537790

ENA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

97/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

HiSeq 2000 RNA-seq of Anopheles gambiae generated 58.7M reads (11.8 Gb, 52.2% GC) with high quality (93–98% bases at Q20–Q30), supporting ultra-deep transcriptome coverage for comprehensive gene expression analysis and confident detection of lowly-expressed genes in this malaria vector.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Anopheles gambiae

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 11859691690 reported

total reads 58711345 reported

n content pct 0.013 measured

pct q20 bases 97.7 measured

pct q30 bases 93.9 measured

gc content pct 52.2 measured

mean read length 101 measured

mean base quality 36 measured

adapter content pct 0.29 measured

duplication rate pct 37.65 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 97/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 93.9 measured ×1 100%

mean base quality 36 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 0.29 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 37.65 measured ×0.4 83%

QC cost 49 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0