ERR552264

ENA first seen 2015

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

92/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

HiSeq 2500 WGS of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex produced 4.4M reads (894 Mb, 64.7% GC) with high quality (89–96% bases at Q20–Q30), sufficient for robust bacterial genome assembly and detection of resistance-conferring variants in TB surveillance and drug-susceptibility profiling.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex sp.

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 894419842 reported

total reads 4427821 reported

n content pct 0.002 measured

pct q20 bases 95.8 measured

pct q30 bases 89 measured

gc content pct 64.7 measured

mean read length 101 measured

mean base quality 34.2 measured

adapter content pct 1.19 measured

duplication rate pct 13.77 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 92/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 89 measured ×1 95%

duplication rate pct 13.77 measured ×0.5 82%

adapter content pct 1.19 measured ×0.4 99%

QC cost 12 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0