Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
94/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex short-read WGS via HiSeq 2500 with 109 million bases and 64.7% GC—appropriate for molecular epidemiology, drug-resistance profiling (rpoB, katG, inhA), and phylogenetic lineage assignment. Strong base quality (96.9% Q20, 92.7% Q30) supports confident SNP calling essential for resistance prediction in this high-GC pathogen.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0