Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
51/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Illumina MiSeq WGS of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (942.2k reads, 284.5 Mb, 53.5% GC) with elevated N-content (17.6%) and lower base quality (77.6% Q20, 72.2% Q30). Potential sequencing artifacts or contamination noted. Reuse requires stringent quality filtering and validation before variant calling.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0