Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
39/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
454 GS FLX Titanium WGS of the plant Fritillaria sewerzowii produced 100k long reads totaling 35.5 Mb with moderate quality (58–83% bases at Q20–Q30) typical of Roche pyrosequencing and 34.4% GC. The long-read format supports de novo plant genome assembly and structural variant discovery, though reuse requires familiarity with 454-specific homopolymer errors and integration with short-read data for base-level accuracy improvement.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0