← Dataset search
ERR605330
ENAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
61/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Oryza sativa
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2000
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
654784178
reported
total reads
3944483
reported
mean coverage
1.5
extrapolated
n content pct
0.012
measured
pct q20 bases
98
measured
pct q30 bases
94.3
measured
gc content pct
43.5
measured
mean read length
83
measured
mean base quality
37.1
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
2.26
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 61/100
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean coverage
1.5
extrapolated
×1.2
0%
pct q30 bases
94.3
measured
×1
100%
duplication rate pct
2.26
measured
×0.5
100%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
29 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0