← Dataset search
ERR636376
ENAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
human gut metagenome
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2000
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
gc sd
10.2
measured
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
10674953960
reported
total reads
54987641
reported
n content pct
0.004
measured
pct q20 bases
99.3
measured
pct q30 bases
95.6
measured
pct reads q30
98.4
measured
sampled bases
62234232
measured
sampled reads
636552
measured
gc content pct
45.8
measured
polyg tail pct
0
measured
read length sd
11.4
measured
quality dropoff
3.4
measured
read length max
101
measured
read length min
20
measured
read length n50
101
measured
max base quality
41
measured
mean read length
97.8
measured
max n pct per pos
0.16
measured
mean base quality
36.7
measured
pct reads lt 100bp
12.85
measured
read length median
101
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
median read quality
37.2
measured
duplication rate pct
0.42
measured
overrepresented top pct
0.02
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 100/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
95.6
measured
×1
100%
duplication rate pct
0.42
measured
×0.5
100%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
16 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0