← Dataset search
ERR637518
ENAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
47/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Ficedula albicollis
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2000
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
gc sd
7.84
measured
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
22332631800
reported
total reads
111663159
reported
n content pct
0.006
measured
pct q20 bases
97.6
measured
pct q30 bases
0
measured
pct reads q30
0
measured
sampled bases
80517200
measured
sampled reads
805172
measured
gc content pct
38.2
measured
polyg tail pct
0
measured
read length sd
0
measured
quality dropoff
-1
measured
read length max
100
measured
read length min
100
measured
read length n50
100
measured
max base quality
30
measured
mean read length
100
measured
max n pct per pos
0.206
measured
mean base quality
25.4
measured
pct reads lt 100bp
0
measured
read length median
100
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
median read quality
25.7
measured
duplication rate pct
3.23
measured
overrepresented top pct
0
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 47/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
0
measured
×1
0%
duplication rate pct
3.23
measured
×0.5
100%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
52 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0