ERR675612

ENA first seen 2018

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

50/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

HiSeq 2000 WGS of mouse gut metagenome produced 3.7M reads (494 Mb, 38.7% GC) with moderate quality (71–95% bases at Q20–Q30) and 0.06% N-content, supporting microbial community composition analysis and identification of abundant taxa. The lower Q30 rate (71%) may reduce sensitivity for rare species or strain-level discrimination in microbiome studies.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

mouse gut metagenome

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 494846161 reported

total reads 3745124 reported

n content pct 0.06 measured

pct q20 bases 94.9 measured

pct q30 bases 71.1 measured

gc content pct 38.7 measured

mean read length 65.9 measured

mean base quality 29.9 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 5.34 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 50/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 71.1 measured ×1 6%

duplication rate pct 5.34 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 12 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0