ERR688378

ENA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

61/100 · D

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

human gut metagenome

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 50970666 reported

total reads 605263 reported

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 92.5 measured

pct q30 bases 75.2 measured

gc content pct 49.6 measured

mean read length 84.3 measured

mean base quality 32.4 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 0.61 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 61/100

The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 75.2 measured ×1 26%

duplication rate pct 0.61 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 29 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0