ERR690809

ENA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

83/100 · B

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

HiSeq 2000 miRNA-seq of Anopheles gambiae produced 7.9M reads (406 Mb, 54.4% GC) with exceptional quality (98–100% bases at Q20–Q30), ideal for miRNA abundance profiling and discovery of microRNA-mediated regulatory networks in this disease vector. Small-RNA sequencing and insect regulatory RNA searches apply.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Anopheles gambiae

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 406836996 reported

total reads 7977196 reported

n content pct 0.014 measured

pct q20 bases 99.6 measured

pct q30 bases 98.6 measured

gc content pct 54.4 measured

mean read length 51 measured

mean base quality 38.8 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 77.52 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 83/100

The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 98.6 measured ×1 100%

mean base quality 38.8 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 77.52 measured ×0.4 0%

QC cost 8 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0