ERR692049

ENA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

47/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Ficedula albicollis

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

gc sd 7.6 measured

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 23394915550 reported

total reads 108323229 reported

n content pct 0.012 measured

pct q20 bases 94.9 measured

pct q30 bases 0 measured

pct reads q30 0 measured

sampled bases 86356050 measured

sampled reads 743340 measured

gc content pct 38.3 measured

polyg tail pct 0 measured

read length sd 23.4 measured

quality dropoff -0.8 measured

read length max 150 measured

read length min 100 measured

read length n50 100 measured

max base quality 30 measured

mean read length 116.2 measured

max n pct per pos 0.068 measured

mean base quality 24.6 measured

pct reads lt 100bp 0 measured

read length median 100 measured

adapter content pct 0.01 measured

median read quality 25.6 measured

duplication rate pct 4.08 measured

overrepresented top pct 0 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 47/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 0 measured ×1 0%

duplication rate pct 4.08 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0.01 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 19 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0