ERR693843

ENA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

47/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Ficedula hypoleuca

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), BAM/CRAM (aligned)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 19897478800 reported

total reads 99487394 reported

n content pct 0.006 measured

pct q20 bases 97.4 measured

pct q30 bases 1.2 measured

gc content pct 38 measured

mean read length 100 measured

mean base quality 25.9 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 3.8 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 47/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 1.2 measured ×1 0%

duplication rate pct 3.8 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 26 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0