ERR777694

ENA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

65/100 · D

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

amplicon

Organism

metagenome

Instrument

Illumina MiSeq

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 265813500 reported

total reads 531627 reported

n content pct 0.046 measured

pct q20 bases 92.5 measured

pct q30 bases 89.5 measured

gc content pct 53.9 measured

mean read length 250 measured

mean base quality 34.8 measured

adapter content pct 18.25 measured

duplication rate pct 89.35 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 65/100

The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 89.5 measured ×1 98%

adapter content pct 18.25 measured ×0.5 0%

QC cost 24 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0