Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
78/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
HiSeq 2500 miRNA-seq of the aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum produced 5M reads (250 Mb, 51.4% GC) with high quality (86–92% bases at Q20–Q30), supporting microRNA abundance profiling and discovery of regulatory RNAs in this model pest insect. Aphid miRNA, plant-insect interactions, and invertebrate ncRNA searches apply to this dataset.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0