ERR843911

ENA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

69/100 · D

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Illumina HiSeq 2500 miRNA-Seq of Acyrthosiphon pisum produces 102.8 million bases across 2.1 million reads at 90.2% Q20. Focused small-RNA data suitable for microRNA discovery and expression profiling in pea aphid.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Acyrthosiphon pisum

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 102798600 reported

total reads 2055972 reported

n content pct 0.014 measured

pct q20 bases 90.2 measured

pct q30 bases 83.9 measured

gc content pct 56.3 measured

mean read length 50 measured

mean base quality 33.5 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 76.09 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 69/100

The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 83.9 measured ×1 70%

mean base quality 33.5 measured ×0.6 92%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 76.09 measured ×0.4 0%

QC cost 28 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0