ERR874013

ENA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

92/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Sus cebifrons

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 3971704000 reported

total reads 19858520 reported

n content pct 0.023 measured

pct q20 bases 92.5 measured

pct q30 bases 87.1 measured

gc content pct 42.2 measured

mean read length 100 measured

mean base quality 34.3 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 2.89 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 92/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 87.1 measured ×1 86%

duplication rate pct 2.89 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 25 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0