← Dataset search
ERR914653
ENAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
64/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: reported
Data type / assay
generic-deposit
Organism
Human immunodeficiency virus 1
Instrument
Illumina MiSeq
Platform
ILLUMINA
Files available
submitted
Metrics (value · how obtained)
base count
40676400
reported
read count
170636
reported
parent study
PRJEB9618
reported
library layout
PAIRED
reported
read length bp
238.4
extrapolated
library strategy
OTHER
reported
checksums present
no
reported
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 6 scored metric(s) → 64/100
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published generic-deposit thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
raw data available
reported
×1.4
100%
depth
reported
×1.2
0%
read length
reported
×0.8
100%
layout paired
reported
×0.6
100%
integrity verifiable
reported
×0.6
0%
instrument declared
reported
×0.4
100%
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-meta-1.0 · provisional — verify independently