ERR978915

ENA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

38/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Equus caballus

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 3086431156 reported

total reads 32834374 reported

n content pct 0.008 measured

pct q20 bases 87.2 measured

pct q30 bases 84.3 measured

gc content pct 47.1 measured

mean read length 94 measured

mean base quality 32.9 measured

adapter content pct 81.35 measured

duplication rate pct 60.55 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 38/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 84.3 measured ×1 72%

duplication rate pct 60.55 measured ×0.5 0%

adapter content pct 81.35 measured ×0.4 0%

QC cost 22 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0