ERR978923

ENA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

97/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Equus caballus

Instrument

Illumina MiSeq

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 23198013 reported

total reads 454863 reported

n content pct 0.004 measured

pct q20 bases 99 measured

pct q30 bases 98.7 measured

gc content pct 43.9 measured

mean read length 51 measured

mean base quality 37.3 measured

adapter content pct 2.75 measured

duplication rate pct 1.53 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 97/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 98.7 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 1.53 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 2.75 measured ×0.4 88%

QC cost 13 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0