ERX1413365

ENA first seen 2018

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

68/100 · D

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

WGS short-read (Homo sapiens). Grade D, 68/100; evidence_strength=0.61 (provisional). Q30 catastrophically absent at 0.5% and mean quality Q4.7 (both measured) render variant calls unreliable despite adequate coverage extrapolation. Not recommended; measured validation pending.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Homo sapiens

Instrument

HiSeq X Ten

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), BAM/CRAM (aligned)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 125378699010 reported

total reads 416311286 reported

mean coverage 40.4 extrapolated

n content pct 0.055 measured

pct q20 bases 8.6 measured

pct q30 bases 0.5 measured

gc content pct 49.5 measured

mean read length 151 measured

mean base quality 4.7 measured

adapter content pct 0.07 measured

duplication rate pct 1.09 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 68/100

The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean coverage 40.4 extrapolated ×1.2 100%

pct q30 bases 0.5 measured ×1 0%

duplication rate pct 1.09 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0.07 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 31 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0