ERX1413368

ENA first seen 2018

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

64/100 · D

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Illumina HiSeq X Ten WGS of Homo sapiens at 50.4× coverage yields 156.3 billion bases but with poor Q-scores (75.6% Q20, only 13.4% Q30). High depth partially compensates for individual-read quality degradation; useful for variant discovery though SNP genotyping confidence reduced versus standard sequencing.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Homo sapiens

Instrument

HiSeq X Ten

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), BAM/CRAM (aligned)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 156287669982 reported

total reads 520285445 reported

mean coverage 50.4 extrapolated

n content pct 0.014 measured

pct q20 bases 75.6 measured

pct q30 bases 13.4 measured

gc content pct 42.2 measured

mean read length 151 measured

mean base quality 22.5 measured

adapter content pct 0.93 measured

duplication rate pct 16.34 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 64/100

The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean coverage 50.4 extrapolated ×1.2 100%

pct q30 bases 13.4 measured ×1 0%

duplication rate pct 16.34 measured ×0.5 74%

adapter content pct 0.93 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 20 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0