ERX2150228

ENA first seen 2020

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

89/100 · B

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Lactobacillus crispatus

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 4000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 930734876 reported

total reads 2060216 reported

n content pct 0.003 measured

pct q20 bases 97.9 measured

pct q30 bases 97.1 measured

gc content pct 37.5 measured

mean read length 225.5 measured

mean base quality 37.6 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 21.33 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 89/100

The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 97.1 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 21.33 measured ×0.5 58%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 39 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0